Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Putting people in orbit isn’t that much cheaper than putting them on the planet and does nothing to mitigate the biggest problem: radiation exposure.


11 posted on 03/29/2015 7:16:02 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman

The reason to put put people in orbit around Mars and bring them back after an interval is the quite sensible approach used by Von Braun — practice and test each step in the process to maximize safety and success.

Like it or not, Mars does have a gravity well, and a landing and return to orbit has never even been tried, nor has a partial touch-and-go return to orbit from descent toward the surface.

Unlike Elon Musk, I don’t think there’s much of a prospect of getting a spacecraft up off the surface of Mars without a significant infrastructure; he switched SpaceX’s heavy engine development from RP-1 to methane, which is available on Mars, and the company is working to perfect an ass-first landing, so the eventual Mars rockets are upright and ready to refuel and return to Earth for another group.

Radiation exposure was brought up earlier in the week, and has nothing to do with anything. Astronauts would have appropriate levels of shielding, just as they do on the ISS. The lunar missions were short-duration and didn’t need much, contrary to what the nutbars claim (the moon landings hoax is itself a hoax).


12 posted on 03/29/2015 7:41:16 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson