You either have knowledge of the existence (hard evidence) or you don't.
True, but that doesn't mean that we are without clues.
Applying Occam's Razor, I've concluded that random chance does not offer a plausible explanation for the advanced structure of our DNA.
What is the alternative to chance? There is a more plausible answer...
I don’t know if y’all are trying to discount what I posted or not. Those weren’t my words, those were from:
http://atheism.about.com/od/aboutagnosticism/a/Atheist-vs-Agnostic-Difference.htm
Which was written by an atheist (a secular humanist, to be precise):
http://atheism.about.com/bio/Austin-Cline-5577.htm
So don’t argue with me about definitions of atheism and agnosticism, since I’m just another stupid Christian on FR, argue with that smarty smart smart atheist.