Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: donna

A lot of male stars of the 1920s-40s were short to medium in height. Then, in the post-war years, and especially on television, there was a trend towards some particularly tall stars. Guys in the 6ft5 to 6ft7 range, like James Arness, Chuck Connors, Clint Walker, Fess Parker and such.

What stands out to me about modern-era male leads is not their height, but their bratty, metrosexual comportment and manner. I find them embarrassing, compared to the kind of sturdy, adult masculine protagonists the culture used to promote. I guess it’s just par-for-the-course in today’s faggoty America, but it never ceases to turn my stomach.


41 posted on 03/19/2015 11:27:52 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: greene66

A little research indicates that the theme of this article simply isn’t correct. Any list of current highest-paid actors is mixed, leaning toward the tall side.


56 posted on 03/19/2015 11:34:35 AM PDT by hlmencken3 (I paid for an argument, but you're just contradicting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson