Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TurboZamboni
Someone made four small chops to Jane's forehead before an ax or cleaver broke open the back of her skull, the researchers said. There were also small knife cuts on her jaw and cheek…. Smithsonian anthropologist Owsley said.. "The recovered bone fragments have unusually patterned cuts and chops that reflect tentativeness, trial and complete lack of experience in butchering animal remains. Nevertheless, the clear intent was to dismember the body, removing the brain and flesh from the face for consumption.”

Oh, please. Any clawed animal could have made those marks. Why would a human go for the face and not the meaty part of the body first? An animal wouldn't have been able to remove the clothing, so would claw at the face.

Just another attempt to demonize the white European settlers.

27 posted on 03/18/2015 7:20:35 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (The greatest danger facing our world: the marriage of militant Islam with nuclear weapons.-Netanyahu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Albion Wilde

Werent the peaceful native americans known for mutilating the bodies of the people they killed?
scalping, disembowelment, etc


30 posted on 03/18/2015 7:47:30 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Albion Wilde

That was a hard hit to the back of the head. It was likely a metal tool or weapon and not from an animal.


41 posted on 03/18/2015 8:21:46 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Albion Wilde

Very likely.


75 posted on 03/20/2015 7:57:16 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson