Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jmacusa
Slavery simply could not have lasted.

I agree, but the question is for how long. I think your belief that it would have been no more than a decade is unrealistic. Having fought a war expressly for the defense of slavery and including clauses in their constitution expressly forbidding the outlawing of slavery, it seems highly unlikely that just a few years later they'd ban the peculiar institution.

While it's possible that some slaveowners would have individually seen the economic sense of emancipation and freed their slaves, I think slavery as a legal institution would have survived well into the 20th Century. Keep in mind that mechanization and advances in pesticides didn't reduce the need for intense labor on cotton until the 1940s.

242 posted on 03/18/2015 10:16:24 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep

If you listen to the “Lost Causers or their sympathizers slavery was already a ‘’dying institution’’ in 1861.(hogwash!) The moral and social imperative against it would have demanded it’s end. And blacks themselves certainly would have rebelled, perhaps more successfully than other failed attempts. Maybe not in a decade perhaps but I would think certainly by the mid-1870s.


249 posted on 03/18/2015 3:32:58 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson