To: Kartographer
Great Britain would never ally itself with a country with the institution of slavery They would if it meant preventing the collapse of their domestic textile industry, whose plants were fed with Southern cotton. However, since they had developed alternative sources and an alliance with the Confederacy probably meant war with France (among others), they wisely thought they'd wait it out to see a winner emerge. When Meade stopped Lee at Gettysburg and Lincoln announced Emancipation, the decision was made for them. Now they could hide their commercial reluctance behind a moral mask and remain above the fray.
To: IronJack
The most likely reason for any British alliance with the confeds would be so that they could stage their troops more conveniently for their next conquest.
108 posted on
03/17/2015 9:46:50 AM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: IronJack
You answered the question: "However, since they had developed alternative sources.."
Developing alternative sources would in the long run be much cheaper than helping in a war to protect something that they had already spent treasure and blood in fighting against.
116 posted on
03/17/2015 9:53:39 AM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson