Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/13/2015 4:29:19 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Rusty0604

I think that filming police is a questionable practice, but necessary in some cases. There are far too many cases of police over-reaching and then charging the individual to cover themselves for that over-reach. In other cases the filming of the police is a trap for them as the individual escalates the incident and then selectively releases that which suits them.

But the idea that you make it a felony to film the police, especially coming from a Republican is obnoxious and the voters in this guys district need to think about another person to serve as their representative.


2 posted on 03/13/2015 4:35:57 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

People of Texas, do you know that THIS is..? It's a PHOTO. It was taken with a CAMERA.

I DO *NOT* LIKE CAMERAS..!!

4 posted on 03/13/2015 4:38:36 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Vllaba? Empowering the police state? Good Lord. Where or was he educated?


6 posted on 03/13/2015 4:40:13 PM PDT by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Sheer idiocy. It’s nonsense like this that makes the GOP look bad.


7 posted on 03/13/2015 4:40:44 PM PDT by arderkrag (The biggest problem faced by any FReeper: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

With Bonehead running the House and McCommie running the Senate, this could pass.


9 posted on 03/13/2015 4:43:12 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Oh a law and order type. /s


10 posted on 03/13/2015 4:45:15 PM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

What’s his email address, I want to tell him “ póg mo thóin”.


15 posted on 03/13/2015 4:47:03 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

OMG, I need to call my state rep and oppose this bill. I believe the vast majority of police discharge their duties lawfully, and, if they do so, they should not worry about being recorded in public places. But I have seen too many cases of abuse of police power to be able to support this bill.


16 posted on 03/13/2015 4:47:10 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Ping.


20 posted on 03/13/2015 4:50:14 PM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

How did someone this stupid get elected inn Texas?

Who goes to jail when a mounted security camera records a cop?


22 posted on 03/13/2015 4:53:42 PM PDT by antidisestablishment (Inaction at this point is not capitulation, itÂ’s cooperation. GOP delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Even if someone is unsure about filming police today, they should realize that it is becoming almost impossible not to, since our everyday items are such natural recording devices.

In five years won’t the idea of having discussed making it a felony to record life in public, seem laughable, or worse, terrifying?


26 posted on 03/13/2015 4:56:27 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

This guy is an IDIOT! What the hell is he thinking?


27 posted on 03/13/2015 4:56:38 PM PDT by babygene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
"Villalba then continued tweeting late through the night, until about 4 a.m., defiantly defending his bill and daring anyone who disagreed with him to “find me an opponent” and vote him out of office."

Local FReepers in his district? Challenge accepted?

29 posted on 03/13/2015 4:58:54 PM PDT by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Wrong in so many ways.

If the police can film you, you can film them. If it is in an area that is open to the public, there is NO expectation of privacy so anyone can be filmed and recorded. Private property owners and other areas that are not public access, then the owner gets to decide what is recorded.


38 posted on 03/13/2015 5:07:09 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
He even worked in concealed carry, they REALLY get discriminated against, when it comes to using their cell phone camera.

"The bill, HB 2918, adds to the definition of what constitutes “interfering” with an officer’s duties, and would make it a Class B Misdemeanor to film, record, photograph, or document the officer within 25 feet while that officer is performing his official duties. That distance is extended to 100 feet if the person is carrying a concealed handgun. There is an exception for news media"

41 posted on 03/13/2015 5:11:00 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Who will be allowed these special privileges and rights? Politicians, hollywood elites, community activists, race pimps. Will Hillary be exempt from her picture being taken? What about James O’Keefe videos? Those ‘poor’ people he exposed - should they get exemptions and special rights and James get imprisoned for multiple felonies? This won’t be about filming police, it will be about elites having special rights.


42 posted on 03/13/2015 5:13:21 PM PDT by Duke of Milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
Villalba himself took to Twitter to defend the bill, with a tweet around 6 p.m. Central Time that insisted that his bill would not stop citizens from holding police accountable or prohibit filming.

I'm sure that we can count on the police to come forward with the evidence that they have collected to show that they acted illegally and without regard to the Constitutional Rights of the citizens.

43 posted on 03/13/2015 5:13:41 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

I didn’t think they were brazen enough to criminalize bloggers yet.


46 posted on 03/13/2015 5:20:16 PM PDT by Ingtar (Mourning for Freedom. I knew her well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Embarrasing that this bonehead has an R after his name.


47 posted on 03/13/2015 5:20:28 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Hidden cameras.


49 posted on 03/13/2015 5:21:12 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson