Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

Any large weapon like a tank has a potential fault which is field service. For all of their faults n armor and gun size the Sherman was dependable and very easy to service/repair in the field. The Tiger was the opposite and break downs took a long time to repair


74 posted on 03/09/2015 2:21:05 PM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jimmy Valentine
Any large weapon like a tank has a potential fault which is field service. For all of their faults n armor and gun size the Sherman was dependable and very easy to service/repair in the field. The Tiger was the opposite and break downs took a long time to repair

Well, I'm just glad I wasn't a track mechanic on the M4A4 Sherman, which had the 30-cylinder A57 mogas engine built by Chrysler, essentially 5 radially mounted six-cylinder auto engines radially mounted around a common crankshaft. Born in the early days of the war, it was one answer to the shortage of circa-500hp engines, mostly [then] aircraft radials, but a mechanic's and manufacturing nightmare.

Most of the things went to the Brits and Russians, though I believe the Marines used some as well.

Remember the treadhead's motto: four hours of maintenance for every hour of operation....


153 posted on 03/12/2015 11:26:06 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson