Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Regal

Before geochemical dating, the earliest hypothesis was borne on relative stratigraphy. As methods improved, series were improved. We’re getting it tighter and tighter all of the time, as more and more data is collected and different methods are developed.


Just sit back and science will eventually find the answer we’ve assumed all along, much like the gay gene, the God gene, global warming, autism-causing vaccines, poisonous GMOs, and other noble scientific endeavors.

I noticed you dodged the part where I asked what revisions were made to hypotheses involving rock/fossil dates because of radiometric dating methods.


57 posted on 03/05/2015 7:33:49 PM PST by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: angryoldfatman

“I noticed you dodged the part where I asked what revisions were made to hypotheses involving rock/fossil dates because of radiometric dating methods.”

____

Huge advances in dating methods refine our knowledge all of the time.

But don’t bother responding-I’m done with you. Ignorance can be overcome with study and discipline, but intentional ignorance is insurmountable.


59 posted on 03/05/2015 8:10:24 PM PST by Regal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson