You’re missing some fairly convincing differing methods of radiometric dating of various rock types, thus also, their sequencing within that same geologic column.
You’re missing some fairly convincing differing methods of radiometric dating of various rock types, thus also, their sequencing within that same geologic column.
Thank you for your short and proper rebuttal.
Now, counterpoint.
How where fossils dated before radiometric dating (I’m assuming potassium-argon) was invented in the 1950s? And did any of the dating done via the radiometric process necessitate scientific revision of the old dates/hypotheses?