1 posted on
02/25/2015 7:26:31 PM PST by
randita
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: SJackson
2 posted on
02/25/2015 7:26:49 PM PST by
randita
(Obama entrusted the transformation of the best healthcare system in the world to a scam artist.)
To: randita
You shoulda seen the one that got away.
3 posted on
02/25/2015 7:27:28 PM PST by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
To: randita
4 posted on
02/25/2015 7:28:05 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(The dog days are over /The dog days are done/Can you hear the horses? /'Cause here they come)
To: randita
It's a well known trick to hold a fish closer to the camera to make it look bigger...
5 posted on
02/25/2015 7:30:41 PM PST by
SGCOS
To: randita
I love catfish but I wonder if one that big tastes the same.
7 posted on
02/25/2015 7:32:48 PM PST by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: randita
It might have been large enough to swallow an Italian man.
10 posted on
02/25/2015 7:50:17 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: randita; Slings and Arrows
"Looks like we're gonna need a bigger box!"
11 posted on
02/25/2015 7:50:53 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: randita; Vendome
I would have to see this from a different angle as it looks as if the photo was manipulated to make the fish look much bigger than it is. I’ve learned lots of tricks to fool the camera.
I’ve seen a few fish brought out of Tenkiller lake in Oklahoma that were about the same weight and no where near that apparent size. It took three men to hold one up years ago and it was not near as tall as the men holding it.
A real fish of this reported size(280 lb) would not even fill a 55 gallon drum.
To: randita
17 posted on
02/25/2015 8:00:29 PM PST by
RC one
(Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
To: randita
"280-pound catfish: Wels catfish caught by Italian fisherman could swallow a man"
So can Emperor Zero... so I heard.
To: randita
When my dad was a young man there was reports of giant catfish in the Cumberland River of Kentucky. I believe so.
21 posted on
02/25/2015 8:08:04 PM PST by
OftheOhio
(never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
To: randita
The size of the mouth is grossly exaggerated due to nearness to the camera and the camera lens itself.
A 280 lb catfish is still a big fish.
24 posted on
02/25/2015 8:10:01 PM PST by
fso301
To: randita
Must have swum near Fukashima.
26 posted on
02/25/2015 8:10:17 PM PST by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
To: randita
Photoshopped. And a fish that size would weigh closer to 1000 lbs, not 280.
38 posted on
02/25/2015 8:36:09 PM PST by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: randita
Yeah that think could at the very least have little difficulty swallowing a small child whole. In many lakes and rivers the largest catfish are for sure considered a legitimate danger when children are swimming; when catfish are active there are reports of kids going underwater and never rising back up.
To: randita
Worthy of a Knights of Columbus’ Friday fish fry.
40 posted on
02/25/2015 8:38:56 PM PST by
353FMG
To: randita
Not as deadly as the Chappaquiddick Carp! aka Ted Kennedy!
50 posted on
02/25/2015 9:24:33 PM PST by
Busko
(The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
To: randita
If that is real it would weigh a lot more than 280 lbs.
58 posted on
02/25/2015 10:15:44 PM PST by
aquila48
To: randita
heck where I come from we use those size fish for bait!
59 posted on
02/25/2015 11:39:10 PM PST by
Bob434
To: Iowa Granny; Ladysmith; Diana in Wisconsin; JLO; sergeantdave; damncat; phantomworker; joesnuffy; ..
If you’d like to be on or off this Outdoors/Rural/wildlife/hunting/hiking/backpacking/National Parks/animals list please FR mail me. And ping me is you see articles of interest.
66 posted on
02/26/2015 5:01:00 AM PST by
SJackson
(“ISIS is now going to regret this … because King Abdullah is not Barack Obama, Rep. Duncan Hunter)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
