Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Colofornian

I’m flattered but you really need to get a life, seriously. Seek profeessional help. Fact remains the only ball two pounds under was the one the colts had all other balls were checked by the refs. Other balls were a tick under and as has been proven over and over and over again on the multiple threads you have posted about ballghazi that a 1 lb change is psi would occur in a difference of 40 degrees if the NFL wants the balls at a certain psi at a certain temp they should change the rule. It does not as you would wish and so desperately try to “prove” with your hours of wasted effort and spreadsheets they cheated. And by your own admission a game in bad weather caused a thousand percent increase in the fumble rate. So GFYS I’m gonna go watch the replay greatest quaterback ever win his fourth superbowl cause of the worst call ever by a Superbowl coach. Also Pete Carroll coached for new england how about a whole new conspiracy theory with spreadsheets facts and diograms of how new england hired Carroll got him to Seattle just so he could make the bad call. That ought to jeep you busy for days.


57 posted on 02/27/2015 7:18:10 AM PST by edzo4 (You call us the 'Party Of No', I call us the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: edzo4
...a 1 lb change is psi would occur in a difference of 40 degrees...

Well, that sucks.

You should have searched harder for somebody to say it would occur in a difference of something higher than that...

'Twas 51 degrees at gametime...and the balls were discovered well before enough time on the clock to have gone by for that kind of temp drop [these games are 90 minutes per half ya know]

Other balls were a tick under...

(Oh, so last post you tried convincing us only ONE ball was under...no mention of these other 10 balls...and now on this post -- when your own sources are tossed in your face -- you finally concede this fact, eh?)

Ya know, illegal contact by a defender is only a "tick" longer than what is legal...

Many holds only become actual restraint because either the blocker or defender holds on to the opponent a few ticks longer...and it moves from just a bad blocking technique or bad defensive posture to an actual hold because once restraint kicks in, it's an actual hold...

But, hey, your extended defense is that those Patriot holds were...
...only a few ticks over...
...those delay of game calls on the Patriots?
...(Just a few ticks over before Brady got the play off)
...Illegal contact?
...Just a tick longer on the receiver as he was going out for the pass...
...Illegal substitution flag?
...Naw, the guy in the game being replaced hung around "a few ticks" longer -- but it was only a "few ticks"

58 posted on 02/27/2015 8:41:17 AM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: edzo4
...few ticks

(Hey, and while you're at it, the next time your fave Pat is called for either offensive or defensive pass interference, just turn to whoever you're watching the game with and say, "It was only a 'few ticks' early...that ref should have left that flag in his pocket.")

Same with your Pat punt coverage...Hey, if they happen to hit the punt returner a tick or two before he actually touches the ball...so what? (Was only a tick or two)

59 posted on 02/27/2015 9:20:00 AM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson