from the article:
The money, frankly, is secondary; the real issue is creativity and capability.
That is dangerous thinking for a capital intensive industry that has been a black hole for those who flew too close to the sun. The auto industry changes glacially for a reason. Apple's cash hoard just gives it a longer rope.
The future of cars is in battery technology: chemistry and physics. This is to cars what Intel is to Apple. An autonomous car powered by an internal combustion engine won't cut it. If Apple is to diversify, there are businesses that are better candidates, like chip fabs.
What would Jobs have done? He was ferocious in delivering a product that the user wanted, not 'brilliant', the word the author likes using.
He was ferocious at delivering a product that the users didn't know they wanted until, suddenly, it was available.