Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
This finding is based on a false premise, that early dogs have to be phenotypically different than wolves. Dogs are wolves in the first place. There is no reason to assume there should be physical changes unless the dogs method of living changed. Once they associated with humans that wouldn't happen until humans became primarily settlement dwellers and not hunter gatherers.

This is a classic case of a theory not being dead until all it's proponents kick the bucket.

19 posted on 02/07/2015 6:46:11 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Varda

“This finding is based on a false premise, that early dogs have to be phenotypically different than wolves. Dogs are wolves in the first place. There is no reason to assume there should be physical changes unless the dogs method of living changed.”

The Russian experiment involving the domestication of fox suggests that there are rapid physiological changes to canids when domestication begins to take hold. I’ve also read that genetically dogs & wolves are practically indistinguishable. Whatever is going on with the evolution of the dogs body type it is both rapid & genetically subtle.


22 posted on 02/07/2015 9:16:42 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson