OK...sure it was just an oversight...but 'tis common courtesy that if you mention another freeper, then ping him/her...
[to appypappy] Do you tire of abortion? Do you think it is murder or a choice? He’s just a pro-abort trying to distract us.
Don't think appypappy is philosophically pro-abort...
However...LOTS of us -- and I include myself here -- are operationally "pro-abort" in that we fail to act as if the pre-born are being murdered daily (around us) in this country.
If we're not actively a solution to the war on the pre-born, then we become -- by omission -- part of the problem.
What is further more problematic reflected by the attitudes on this thread -- as expressed by appypappy and trisham -- is what I've expressed previously on several earlier (previous year) threads:
Some people wind up being more provoked by...
...specific images...
...than by the legal acts which created these images in the first place.
(And just because folks are ignorant of images does not make the exposition of these images the problem)
The questions to ask posters appypappy and trisham are:
Have you given "feedback" direct to the picture-holders -- the ones you immorally reference as "abortion pornsters"??? (Or do you only complain about them on forums like these)
Secondly, have you given negative DIRECT feedback to either the abortion industry or to its legal pathfinders (Supreme Court; legislators)?
Thirdly, have you complained more about the evidence that a murder has been committed (abortion pictures) or that these very murders have occurred?
It's answers to these specific questions which will reveal the ethical priorities or ethical AWOL vacuums to be further commented upon.
Thanks for your response. As to not pinging appypappy, or anyone else, how do I do that if I am not replying to a post of theirs?