Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy

It was 1985, Photoshop was not even around in the imaginations of sci-fi writers then, and the abortion industry was just over 10 yrs past Roe v. Wade and had no reason to try and cover what they were doing.

I can’t believe you compared us to PETA. You basically just made their “Halocaust on a Plate” argument that peoples’ and animals’ lives are of equal value.

If you feel the need to close your eyes and shake your head and say “LA LA LA LA!” about the grim reality of abortion then continue to do so. Those of us who are braver will continue to show those who have eyes to see, what is actually happening.


43 posted on 02/08/2015 10:36:55 PM PST by To Hell With Poverty (All freedom must be transported in bottles of 3 oz or less. - Freeper relictele)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: To Hell With Poverty

Your Clintonian “The ends justifies the means” approach isn’t conservative. You could use more civilized images but those don’t get your rocks off. You aren’t interested in education. You just want to shock people so you can get your jollies. If you had a shred of decency, you would be appalled at the treatment of the dead in your images. You are no different from a group who try to gross people out with images of dead animals. Like you, they also think they are justified because they “have the moral high ground”.
I don’t need to see a picture of a dead baby to know that abortion is wrong.


44 posted on 02/09/2015 5:36:30 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson