Your statement, to which mine was a response was this:
If Congress was to pass a bill and a president signed it into law or if the Supreme Court was to rule that two U.S. citizen parents are required in order to be a natural born citizen, I would be supportive, but that is not the case at this time.
I read that as meaning that you think "natural born citizen" can be changed by an act of congress. I was just pointing out that this is tantamount to amending the constitution by statute.
You’re reading too much in to my statement; not “changed” but explicitly delineated.
In 1875 in Minor v Happersett, the Supreme Court said that “the Constitution does not say, in words, who shall be natural born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to determine that.”
I was suggesting that a possible “elsewhere” might be a bill passed by Congress and signed into law by a president.
All we need to do is look at what has occurred in the absence of such clarifying legislation.