Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Writing the Constitution, adopting the Constitution, amending the Constitution and interpreting the Constitution were/are all “man-made acts.”

All statutory law, treaties, case law, and federal regulations that haven’t been explicitedly ruled to be unconstituional exist under the Constitution. That includes recognizing who is and who is not a natural born citizen.


157 posted on 02/19/2015 2:14:41 PM PST by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus
Writing the Constitution, adopting the Constitution, amending the Constitution and interpreting the Constitution were/are all “man-made acts.”

But none of that makes babies, which are natural acts. No amount of scribbling and proclaiming alters nature.

A cow begats a calf, not a chicken. Acts of man proclaiming otherwise are of no effect. They can redefine words, but they can't redefine nature.

All statutory law, treaties, case law, and federal regulations that haven’t been explicitedly ruled to be unconstituional exist under the Constitution.

Which is inferior to and the subsequent product of, the Declaration. The Constitution is but merely the third governing document of our Nation. The founding document was the first, and it cites nature and God as it's authority. According to the understanding of the time, there was no higher power.

That includes recognizing who is and who is not a natural born citizen.

Which is just as valid as deciding which cows will have chickens. Man made laws do not decide such things.

159 posted on 02/19/2015 2:30:49 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson