The problem with a hereditary monarchy is that you have to put up with bad kings for life. but when you have a good king, he views his subjects as his family, hence the rage of King Abdullah II.
I’ll still take a constitutional republic, given the choice, but I fully understand the King’s anger.
Yes.
That’s why it is always said that the best form of government is the “benevolent dictator”
Because he acts like a loving father would to his children.
Not like a greedy government bureaucrat
Of course this is so rare, like a magical unicorn. So the next best thing is a constitutional republic, where everyone gets to act like a parent to their own family with their own money
Our King. The Good King Putt (the Foreth), is more concerned with his handicap than protecting the citizenry.