Posted on 02/03/2015 8:40:24 AM PST by Thurstan
Have you ever run across couples who want to tell you were pregnant?
Its part of the gender neutrality, everyone is the same, there is no difference between men and women, nonsense.
(Excerpt) Read more at epictimes.com ...
DON’T, fer the love of all that’s holy, google “pregnant men”!!!!!
Never underestimate the depths the left will sink to to minimize the role of the father in producing a child.
I will forever refuse to shut up about “women’s issues”.
Unless you’re a tranny. Then it’s a requirement.
Why are you griping at women when the author is a man?
When was the last time a man had a legal say in an abortion?
I’d say that men who say that deserve a kick in the nutz, but they don’t have any.
Wasn’t planning on it ... and I don’t really have time to hunt pictures of Jerry Doyle. He’s like a taller, better-looking Bruce Willis, with a personality. Muy caliente!
It is more evidence that the feminazis think with their body not their minds ... all focus for that idiot assertion about ‘men are not’ is sensory based, with no mental strength allowed to edit their soul, their behavior mechanism.
He has the same God given rights. That doesn’t mean our government is bothering to protect them.
I usually hear it said “We are trying..”
Not “I am” or “She is”.
Like I said, it does take two.
I do, too.
But, even so, I would be remiss if I failed to acknowledge that there is some support for it:
(Gen 2:24)
That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.(Matt 19:4,5)
"Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,' and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'?(Eph 5:31-33)
"For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh." This is a profound mystery--but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.
Garibaldi ...
B-5 was a great show. I'm unqualified to comment on his 'hotness'.
“Remember gals..”
I think the majority of postings thus far are from male freepers. FWIW.. I don’t mind the phrase but I think it is incorrect English. We used “We’re expecting”.
AS of a couple of years ago, he was a radio host in Las Vegas ... and he’s better looking now than he was in the 1990s.
(We have the whole series on DVD.)
Sounds somewhat better that “popped hot on another baby-mama that I’ll never see or support”
I felt like was when I became constipated from narcotic pain relievers after orthopedic surgery LOL! I had to use Lamaze breathing techniques.
If you had manufactured stirrups out of belts.. it REALLY WOULD HAVE BEEN BAD!! LOL.
The word “pregnant” originates in roots that mean “before” and “born,” so in its strictest sense, it would be only the mother who is in the condition of “going to give birth.” However, in more general usage, “pregnant” can simply mean “waiting,” as in the common phrase, “pregnant pause.”
Meanwhile from the BBC:
3 February 2015 Last updated at 12:02 ET
MPs say yes to three-person babies
By James Gallagher
In an historic move, MPs have voted in favour of the creation of babies with DNA from two women and one man.
The UK is now set to become the first country to introduce laws to allow the creation of babies from three people.
In a free vote in the Commons, 382 MPs were in favour and 128 against the technique that stops genetic diseases being passed from mother to child.
During the debate, ministers said the technique was “light at the end of a dark tunnel” for families.
Proponents said the backing was “good news for progressive medicine”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.