Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tinyowl

Well seems to me then you’re saying that the Patriots aren’t that good either since they barely beat us...in fact I think we beat us.

There was luck the other way too....tripping not being called on the Pats, etc.


108 posted on 02/01/2015 8:59:06 PM PST by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Aria

I’m not an ‘us’ guy even though I’m from Boston. I believe the Patriots are the better team this year, and would win 3 of 5 in a series that sanded off the rough edges of random luck plays. 12 or 13 of 20.

And I could be wrong. But I think the Patriots are a consistently better team, and that the Seahawks luck, which made up for their inconsistencies over the past 2 games, ran out.

My post was more about -> what would make Pete and/or staff make a call like that? - he’s obviously no idiot coach. Why would he accept the risk? And my best guess is: he was feeling lucky/cocky in the realm-of-passing ... so his judgment was clouded. But for the risk, and given that Lynch was a marked man, it’s a good choice. ... But only without the risk.


120 posted on 02/01/2015 9:22:53 PM PST by tinyowl (A equals A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson