To: Gamecock
The problem is that the armed forces are being cut back and the USAF has no love of the A-10, which does not support their primary charter, but the Army’s.
6 posted on
01/28/2015 2:29:15 PM PST by
expat2
To: expat2
Then I guess, they don’t much care for the AC-130 gunships either. Not fast, not sexy and ugly. But sure does put a world of hurt on bad guys harassing our guys.
To: expat2
"The problem is that the armed forces are being cut back and the USAF has no love of the A-10, which does not support their primary charter, but the Army’s." If supporting the effort on the ground isn't part of the AF's "primary charter" then who needs the current Air Force? Let's go back to the USAAF.
18 posted on
01/28/2015 3:12:54 PM PST by
Flag_This
(You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
To: expat2; All
the solution: Give all responsibility and resources (CASH) to the
Army..and tell the (USAF, Anti A-10) Zoomies, to go to HELL.
It's the protection of the Ground Forces, Stupid!..not when "your panties" get in a bunch!
27 posted on
01/28/2015 4:04:37 PM PST by
skinkinthegrass
("Bathhouse" E'Bola/0'Boehmer/0'McConnell; all STINK and their best friends are flies. d8^)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson