[stormer]

Peer reviewed in a “journal” whose stated purpose is “set to accelerate the pace and heighten the tone of the debate over intelligent design”. This isn’t science, it’s apologetics.

[Heartlander]

Intelligent design is not creationism, nor is it a religious position. It is the application of design theory to the natural and living world.

As for science or research - from the new intelligent design research lab, there was discussion of two technical articles published in the Journal of Molecular Biology by protein scientist Doug Axe (for abstracts, see here and here). As the New Scientist acknowledged, funding for the research underlying these peer-reviewed articles was provided by Discovery Institute's research fellowship program--thus disproving the twin canards that Discovery Institute does not support scientific research, and that pro-ID scientists do not publish peer-reviewed research.
For more ID papers see HERE or HERE