I don’t think so, but then again I didn’t pay much attention to the Sandusky defenders. I don’t know why you would try to compare a case against children that was tried in a court of law with a case against adult women tried in the court of public opinion.
Why would you compare the two?
Because they are so similar, that’s why. The Sandusky accusers actually had LESS evidence than the Cosby accusers BTW. In fact, the Sandusky accusers had no DNA, no video, no witnesses that could identify any victim of abuse, no police reports on several of the abuse allegations (one of the boys had told the police after the alleged abuse happened, but they didn’t take it seriously and told Sandusky to stop showering with boys).
I find it awfully incredible that all the people that defend Cosby for lack of “evidence” don’t defend Sandusky too.