Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Quality_Not_Quantity

Then your sister is a thief. She entered into a contract with the lender and is obligated to abide by the terms of the mortgage.


Actually, the contract gave her the option of either making the payments or giving the property back. She and the bank have been negotiating ever since. It’s all legal.

She’s just playing their game.


29 posted on 01/12/2015 10:51:59 AM PST by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

I seriously doubt the contract gave her the option. The “option” to give the property back is called being in default. The property was merely collateral. It is legal in the sense that the bank can take the property back to cover some of its losses. It is not legal to the original terms of the mortgage except as a safety net for the bank in the case of deadbeat customers who default on the agreement. Sounds like your sister is even taking advantage of that and living in a house she is not paying for. Shame shame shame!!!!

The “or give it back” condition applies to leases, not mortgage purchases. Was it a lease purchase? If it was, even then the sister should be paying a payment while she lives there.

Legal is not a relative term meaning “whatever you can get away with.”


33 posted on 01/12/2015 12:29:34 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson