Replies

That’s up to you. Your argument, which you made repeatedly, was that the lawyer in the article is wrong because he is pro-abortion and pro-drug.

I’m pointing out that by the same logic, you should agree with Patrick Kennedy on abortion (he loveloveloves it!) since you spout Kennedy’s line on marijuana.

Your argument is that one has to agree with everything or nothing a person says. Own your argument.

You’re the one in total agreement with Patrick Kennedy, an admitted druggie, a drunk driver and regular old drunk, on the issue of drugs.

Because if Patrick Kennedy can’t manage his life, and he really can’t, it makes sense to him (and using your own argument, you) to have the government manage it for him and everyone else.

Or maybe, just maybe, someone can be wrong about one thing (abortion) and right about others (the WOD not helping people quit drugs.

I don’t do drugs.

I don’t drink.

I’m just sick to death of our now militarized police force, and cops using flash-bang grenades which burn off baby faces.

See, I love babies before and after they are born and am tired of the collateral “oopsies” that kill children and their families in the WOD. The same WOD that has yet to stop anyone any where from doing drugs.

I do not know what the answer is. I just know that it isn’t a further erosion of our rights with no results.