Well hardly ever*
I mean, its not like there is a group of women out there who have been planning since 2005 how to shake down Bill for more money...
Right?
* only when a $100,000,000 is available..
Well hardly ever*
I mean, its not like there is a group of women out there who have been planning since 2005 how to shake down Bill for more money...
Right?
* only when a $100,000,000 is available..
The overwhelming majority of witnesses are not filing lawsuits. The overwhelming majority of witnesses are not seeking damages in court.
If Beverly Johnson had been seeking money, she would have filed a lawsuit.
I have not so far read that Beverly Johnson (who is incidentally the topic of this thread) is filing a lawsuit.
If you have information to support your contention that Beverly Johnson is filing a lawsuit for money, or is extorting BC for money, please feel free to cite.
The only thing that seems remotely relevant is your oblique and weak attempt to joke about BJ’s age in your meme photo (BILL COSBY RAPED ME TOO 100,000 YEARS AGO).
So (please correct me if I mistook your meaning) you hold older women in contempt and believe older women are more inclined to lie for monetary gain, even if the subject of this thread (BJ) is not after monetary gain. You are essentially deriding BJ because she is old and you are implying she is after money, without any citation in support.
Or perhaps you believe that BJ and her daughter are part of a 9 year conspiracy to bring down BJ, and part of the conspiracy was to wait 9 years to bring accusations out? And that BJ has been promised a payoff for her story from the minority of BC accusers who are suing?
Right?
Why was BJ not in the 2005 lawsuit if she is a part of the anti-BC conspiracy? Is it your belief that there are multiple conspiracies against BC, with several years of planning in between them? Or is it your belief that the conspiracies are linked into some kind of anti-BC super-conspiracy, with allegations deviously timed to go off at 9 year intervals against now 77yo BC?