To: txnativegop
I'm unclear ont eh cannon firing rate vs. prop blade passing rate and the variations of each plotted up.
It's certainly possible to avoid the prop blades, but just how tough is it?
26 posted on
12/17/2014 9:19:20 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Paladin2
it is just a matter of timing, how long will the projectile take to get from firing point to the prop disk.
the fastest rate of fire that I am aware is 1500 rpm.
but for the basics of it try this :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronization_gear
32 posted on
12/17/2014 9:32:04 PM PST by
txnativegop
(Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
To: Paladin2
I'm unclear ont eh cannon firing rate vs. prop blade passing rate and the variations of each plotted up. It's certainly possible to avoid the prop blades, but just how tough is it? Many WW II aircraft had nose-mounted machine guns firing thru the propeller arc. They were synchronized so as to avoid damage.
Apparently, it was no big deal.
34 posted on
12/17/2014 9:34:25 PM PST by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: Paladin2
I'm unclear ont eh cannon firing rate vs. prop blade passing rate and the variations of each plotted up. It's certainly possible to avoid the prop blades, but just how tough is it?
It took a pretty smart Fokker to invent the interrupter gear to fire the machine gun when the prop isn't in the way.
40 posted on
12/17/2014 9:52:53 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson