Try not to get so upset. No doubt that humans have evolved with the hard wiring in their brains that results in a strong emotional commitment to the care and well being of their helpless dependent newborn offspring. Otherwise the species however complex would have gone extinct. Historically rape and the procreative reality of rape has been well documented. The massive and systemic rapes of Genghis Khan and his hordes have been historically and genetically verified. The recorded histories of Europe are replete with the rapes of vulnerable women by kings, dukes, nobles, public officials, soldiers,slave owners, wealthy individuals the “rights of the signors”. Those are just the recorded histories. The story in Africa and the Mideast if you care to look is much the same today. Believe me, am all in favor of social advances and the veneer of civilization however thin but feminism is faced with stubborn facts and biological hard wired imperatives to procreate. Foolish to assume that you can negate or legislate fully the hormonal response of a biologically intact male when he is confronted with a woman he deems capable of child bearing. Biology rules in the end. However it is a noble endeavor of civilization to protect vulnerable women but unfortunately evolutionary realities that motivate human behavior are not politically correct or even nice.
My initial reaction began with the words : "Shut your ..." and ended up on a very rude note.
My more considered response: I deal in fact. You interpret this as mere "upsetness," but this only shows your lack of adequate comprehension.
The discussion shows an overall obliviousness to the distinction between "Men commit rape aplenty," and "Rape is connatural to man."
The argument has been made on this thread that rape makes a positive contribution to human reproductive fitness. This is rubbish, because it works against the formation of stable interpersonal social bonds, which IS a requirement of human reproductive fitness.