Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

“Poverty” is defined as a percentage of income below the average. Therefore, it is impossible to eliminate “poverty,” because there will always be 20% that are at the bottom of income distribution.


37 posted on 12/15/2014 12:37:48 PM PST by Tax-chick (R.I.P., Dad, 11/25/14. Thanks for the lawyers, guns, and money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

“Poverty” is defined as a percentage of income below the average. Therefore, it is impossible to eliminate “poverty,” because there will always be 20% that are at the bottom of income distribution.
= = = = = = = = = = = =
In the same vein, the reason ‘min wage’ doesn’t work.

If minimum wage has the desired effect, to raise the spending power of workers, that would mean that EVERYONE would have to get a raise the same percentage as the min wage.(I think Unions have this written in)
As long as people get FIRED, let go, quota ed, downsized or whatever word they want to use, the ‘reason’ for the min wage is gone as, in effect, the unemployed level will rise.
If EVERYONE gets say a raise to 15 per hour, including the guy stocking shelves in the store that means the price of the product should go up accordingly.

It is costing you MORE to sell the same product,from the lowest picker in the field to the steak on the table that started with the lowest picker in the field. SO EVERY step of the way it went ‘up’ to accommodate the ‘raise’.

Like when the power co says your newest rate raise is only 3cents per day, say, Ok, I will mail you a check every day for 3cents to cover the raise.
In a true sense, the rate would either be dropped OR they would just quit telling one how much the raise was on a daily basis.


65 posted on 12/15/2014 12:55:49 PM PST by xrmusn ((6/98)those who understand, no explanation needed-Those who don't none will work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick
“Poverty” is defined as a percentage of income below the average. Therefore, it is impossible to eliminate “poverty,” because there will always be 20% that are at the bottom of income distribution.

We have a Winner!

There are two tails on a bell curve. In this case, poverty is on one, incredibly wealthy occupies the other.

93 posted on 12/15/2014 1:40:01 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson