DogWrangler's thoughts on the subject are his own.
I reread your explanation for about a dozen times and it is a little clearer. Nowhere in Dog Wrangler's post did I come to the conclusion he advocated lynching anyone. Nor do/did I. I did and do advocating defending one's self when attacked and I am for defending one's family should they be attacked. How you construed that to be a lynch party, I will never know.
I don't know why you have chosen to respond while he has said nothing.
I apologize to you both if I have misinterpreted your words. Anyone has the right to defend himself, up to an including killing an attacker.