Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
If you are trying to make an analogy, I would suggest you pick a Fort that was right smack dab in the middle of an entrance to an Important city where it's presence cannot be ignored. How did the founders feel about British forts in New York or Boston Harbors I wonder?

British forts at Detroit, Mackinac, Niagara and Oswego gave the British control over the entire Great Lakes, something far more important than a minor harbor that took in less than 1% of the business the port of New York did.

304 posted on 12/10/2014 6:09:05 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels"-- Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
British forts at Detroit, Mackinac, Niagara and Oswego gave the British control over the entire Great Lakes, something far more important than a minor harbor that took in less than 1% of the business the port of New York did.

Importance is relative and I think highly dependent upon who's ox is getting gored. Even if the British had interfered with no trade, the presence of British troops manning a Fort in New York or Boston would have been intolerable to the US Government.

313 posted on 12/11/2014 6:03:38 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson