[campaignPete R-CT]

MIA vs PITT, common games
BALT KC NYJ JAX are the common opponents
MIA 2-1 with 2 to play (BALT NYJ)
PIT 2-2 with 1 to play (KC)

MIA has an advantage there and looks a good bet over PITT.
PITT has a bit of an advantage in SOV, so MIA better beat BAL and, by doing so, get common over PITT

MIA did lose head to head vs KC, which is a problem for them.

[campaignPete R-CT]

UPDATE! TIEBREAKERS

NFC TIEBREAK	PHI	DAL	GB	DET	SEA	SAN FRAN	ARIZ
PHIL	. .-	PHIL-4	GB-1	DET-3	?-1, SEA-3	SF-1,3	AZ-1,3
DAL	PHIL-4	. .-	dal-L4	DET-3	?-1, SEA-3	SF-1, L3	AZ-1,L3
GB	GB-1	dal-L4	. .-	det-L1,L3 gb-L2	SEA-1,3	sf-L3,Lsov gb-L4	az-L3
DET	DET-3	DET-3	det-L1,L3 gb-L2	. .-	SEA-4	det-L3,L4 sf-Lsov	AZ-1, det-L3
SEA	?-1, SEA-3	DAL-1, SEA-3	SEA-1,3	SEA-4	. .-	sea-L1,L2 SF-4	sea-L1, L2, ARIZ-4
SAN FRAN	SF-1,3	SF-1, L3	sf-L3,Lsov gb-L4	det-L3,L4 sf-Lsov	sea-L1,L2 SF-4	-	az-L1,L2,L3 sf-Lsov
ARIZ	AZ-1,3	AZ-1,L3	az-L3	AZ-1, det-L3	sea-L1, L2, ARIZ-4	az-L1,L2,L3 sf-Lsov	-

1- ...HEAD-TO-HEAD
2- ...DIV REC
3- ...CONF REC
4- ...COMMON GAMES
XXX = no tie is possible.
? tiebreakers (to be determined). explained in detail ELSEWHERE in this thread

The bold ones are clinched tiebreakers.
Also, lower case indicates a lead, but not a clinch.
example GB vs DET:
det-L1,L3 gb-L2
means DET leads in head-to-head and conference. GB leads in DIV record.