Posted on 11/22/2014 10:22:54 AM PST by Olog-hai
Officials in a Polish town (Tuszyn) have opposed a proposition to name a playground after Winnie-the-Pooh due to the bears unclear gender and immodest clothing. [ ]
Voice recordings of the meeting were leaked to the media in which officials complained that Pooh Bear is immodestly dressed and also lacks a clear gender. One called the bear a hermaphrodite.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
It seems that Pooh-pooh is also a Satan worshipper. :(
Warning...some language:
http://youtu.be/aLd7-bXv8NA
The thing about cartoon animals is that when it comes to clothes, it’s kinda gotta be all or nothing. No clothes at all means your fur is your clothing, so no problem there. Where Pooh gets into trouble is in wearing the shirt but skipping the pants. It’s a mixed message that suggests the possibility of nakedness while at the same time leaving possible nakedness exposed. And yes, Donald Duck, this means you too, buddy.
Historically speaking, Poles have excellent reasons to dislike Russians. As, of course, going back a couple more centuries, the Russians have to dislike Poles.
He saw an animal that liked to growl
Big furry paws and he liked to howl
Great big furry back and furry hair
“Ah, think I’ll call it a bear”.
http://www.lyricsmode.com/lyrics/b/bob_dylan/man_gave_names_to_all_the_animals.html
Bob Dylan, but during his Christian music era.
Why give Disney the free publicity?
You could say the same thing about the French and the Germans with as much (or as little) justice.
The Muslims seem to like Pooh-pooh, but not the piggie:
Muslims want Pooh, not Piglet
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/nov/15/books.booksnews1
True. Or the French and English, or the Irish and English.
Europe does not have a long history of playing nice together.
The character is not a Disney original by far. Disney adapted A.A. Milne’s stories and E.H. Shepard’s artwork, and Pooh is unclothed (most of the time) in the original artwork.
Once upon a time I had a girlfriend who called me Boo Boo Bear. I never did figure out why.
There's a irony here -- if the town loved Winnie so much that they did name the park after Winnie and used his image, Disney could well possibly them for copyright infringement -- so they're better off coming up with their own name for the park.
FWIW: There is a popular urban legend that Donald Duck was once banned in Finland for not having any pants. This myth was sparked up by an incident in 1977, when Helsinki councilman Markku Holopainen proposed discontinuing the use of city funds for the purchase of Aku Ankka comics [Donald Duck in Finnish] for youth centers, to cope with the city's financial difficulties. The following year, as Holopainen was running for a Parliament seat, his opponent called him "the man who banned Donald Duck from Helsinki". Holopainen lost the election. Wikipedia
Tigger was definitely on speed.
He’s a Teddy Bear for God’s sake. So do Poles sew genitalia on theirs? These people have dirty minds.
Yes but if you were familar with the original literary source material, there it is explained to the narrator by The Boy, that because the toy bear is a boy bear, he is called Winnie-the-Pooh, not Winnie
The half naked appears to be Walt's kink, not AA Milne's
In other words Winnie “ boy bear” was “the pooh” A swan.
Disney doesn’t own the character, but AP was trolling for clicks and was successful by making more jokes at the Poles’ expense (again, they had another article awhile back about a Polish photographer who fell of a cliff backing up to take a shot).
Near the end of the very brief article, it came out that it was a joke made at the end of a meeting about the playground that was going on entirely too long.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.