[Steve_Seattle]

"Well I have trouble with big words. After all, liability has five whole syllables. And then I go and do things like presume a dissertation on the study of the applicability of liability would include discussions on the acceptable interpretive limits of truth-telling vis-à-vis the declared focal issue of "defensive" situations, leaping from there to my admittedly indefensible presumption that truth-telling would or could be contrasted with the concept of being responsible or even guilty of "lying." But your point is well taken."

In terms of the context of the situation taken as a whole, and accounting for all variables, known and unknown, along with the inherent malleability of all possible parameters, and the persistence of oxymorons, you just might be right. :.)

[Talisker]

In terms of the context of the situation taken as a whole, and accounting for all variables, known and unknown, along with the inherent malleability of all possible parameters, and the persistence of oxymorons, you just might be right. :.)

Let's not get carried away. "Right" carries heavy socioeconomic implications and patriarchal judgement attachments, not to mention longstanding and overt political biases which can easily be seem as denigrating women, children, the LGBT community and people of color if not accompanied by a completely filled out Form B-1A5 that has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate student government Hate Protection Committee.

Which is why I'd just rather say that since the Moon is in the Seventh House, and Jupiter aligns with Mars, I feel that at the end of the day I'm on the same page as those who seek progressive clarification of goal assessments in this particular area (assuming preliminary group acceptance of my submission), while always remaining open to coalition-building feedback concerning any unrecognized, privilege-based global warming repercussions.