Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

When an inadvertently clicked YouTube pop-up ad led me to the website, I decided to have a bit of fun and VOTE. For my top three preferences for the Democrat nominee in 2016 I listed Karl Marx, Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse-tung.

I was required to give contact info so I entered fictitious data for Rush's favorite Georgetown University grad student.

After this was entered, the website gave the current leaders in the poll.

Elizabeth Warren - 42%
Bernie Sanders - 25%
Hillary Clinton - 24%
Robert Reich - 3%
Joe Biden - 2%

Do you suppose my choices tilted the Poll results?

/s

1 posted on 11/14/2014 3:24:35 PM PST by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BwanaNdege

Nobody wants Old Joe, least of all the millenials.
Sometimes Joe Biden is right on the money, two minutes later, he stuns the world with an emptyheaded comment or gesture. One step forward and one hundred steps back.


2 posted on 11/14/2014 3:32:33 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege

NOTICE HOW OLD THESE FOLKS WILL BE COME 2016:

Elizabeth Warren - 67
Bernie Sanders - 75
Hillary Clinton - 69
Robert Reich - 70
Joe Biden - 73

With all due respect to the seniors among us, but this is not the party of the future...


3 posted on 11/14/2014 3:32:54 PM PST by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege

I hope for clown Warren...she would never be able to withstand like Hillary could as she is much more hot tempered and a hyper socialist leftie.


4 posted on 11/14/2014 3:33:24 PM PST by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege
This is not a scientific poll. Warren won't win the nomination. The Democrats would be insane to nominate Princess Little Big Liar. She didn't win by all that much in Massachusetts in a democratic presidential election year, how is she supposed to be viable nationally?
5 posted on 11/14/2014 3:33:39 PM PST by Bettyprob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege

I really don’t understand the appeal of the crazy, lying, out of touch, SHRILL AS HILLARY fraud known as Elizabeth Warren. She’s just a crazy, ugly, non-photogenic Clinton clone.


6 posted on 11/14/2014 3:35:52 PM PST by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege

What? I can understand why they’d have every one on that list but Reich. Hillary? It’s her turn. Biden? He’s VP. Warren? She’s the hot new thing. Sanders? He’s the only honest socialist among them. But what in the world is the attraction of Reich?


7 posted on 11/14/2014 3:41:30 PM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege

Why wasn’t Jonathan Gruber one of the options? All that great work he did getting ObamaDon’tCare passed and this is the thanks he gets?


10 posted on 11/14/2014 3:53:12 PM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege

Bernie’s the one

“You Want a Avowed..Communist...Vote For Bernie”

thats the strategy!!


11 posted on 11/14/2014 3:54:29 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege

112 years in politics and Joe the drunk Biden can’t garner but 2%?
Hey JOe, you suck and everyone knows it;


14 posted on 11/15/2014 2:47:09 AM PST by Joe Boucher (The F.B.I. Is a division of holders Justice Dept. (Nuff said))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson