To: C19fan
Let's see:
After separation from Rosetta, the thrusters meant to direct the probe to the comet's surface didn't work.
Then, the two "harpoons" meant to anchor the probe to the comet's surface didn't deploy, resulting in the probe "bouncing" into its current position, resting in a hole or on the edge of a cliff.
So, what exactly went right with this mission?
13 posted on
11/13/2014 6:00:29 AM PST by
Sicon
("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
To: Sicon
So, what exactly went right with this mission?
A lot more than what has gone wrong. Just getting there was an amazing feat.

16 posted on
11/13/2014 6:03:45 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(You can't half ass conservatism.)
To: Sicon
So, what exactly went right with this mission?
...
The hype machine has worked perfectly.
18 posted on
11/13/2014 6:04:59 AM PST by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Sicon
The probe is on the comet, taking pictures, gathering solar energy, operating probes & analyzers, and communicating regularly with the orbiter & Earth. All less so than intended, but still way better than outright crashing or bouncing off & away.
25 posted on
11/13/2014 6:23:03 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(You know what, just do it.)
To: Sicon
So, what exactly went right with this mission? For starters, a man made probe traveled approximately 4 billion miles and landed on a comet.
Roughly the equivalent of hitting a speck of dust with a BB gun from a distance of 10 miles.
26 posted on
11/13/2014 6:31:40 AM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are not inclined to commit crimes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson