You’re welcome, Loren. [Yes, I remembered.]
So now, how about it? If your idea is so good, why wasn’t it implemented decades ago re: the public school destruction of our kids & our country? Specifically, when the radical left took over the schools & started actively pushing the homosexual agenda to kids as young as five, why wasn’t your great select committee idea implemented? Why wasn’t it used to salvage our kids and our schools?
Hmm?
I am not Loren.
If you do not want a select investigative committee of Congress to take up the Obama eligibility issue, to each his own.
My thought on that strategy is that the Founding Fathers of this nation believed in select committees more than they believed in standing committees. Standing committees can tend to become entrenched and overly politicized but constituting a select committee narrows its focus and it then goes out of business once its investigative work is done. You also tend to get a committee made up of members of Congress with specific expertise in the subject matter that is under investigation.
For example, the Select Watergate Committee’s work ultimately resulted in the resignation of a president.
I would love to see the key actors in the Obama eligibility debate, such as the Hawaii Registrar of Vital Statistics and Obama’s former attorney, Judith Corley who brought copies of his birth certificate back from Hawaii have to answer congressional subpoenas and be placed under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over their heads.
Regular lawsuits on this issue have not resulted in that outcome even once over the last six, going on seven years.