To: SoConPubbie
No candidate will meet the universal demands of FR purity.
(Reagan certainly wouldn’t have)
But I’m excited that there is now a non-zero chance of having a Republican POTUS in 2017.
29 posted on
11/09/2014 2:03:54 PM PST by
nascarnation
(Impeach, Convict, Deport)
To: nascarnation
But I’m excited that there is now a non-zero chance of having a Republican POTUS in 2017.
Only if there is no one in the eventual field of GOP POTUS candidates who is:
1. Pro-Life
2. Anti-Gay Agenda
3. Anti-Amnesty
30 posted on
11/09/2014 2:06:04 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: nascarnation
No candidate will meet the universal demands of FR purity. (Reagan certainly wouldn’t have)
Utter nonsense and B.S.
Reagan easily passes muster where conservatism is concerned.
Yes he passed an Amnesty, however, he realized that it was the biggest mistake of his political career.
If Reagan were alive and running today, he would no more back Amnesty than he would be Pro-Abortion in any sense.
31 posted on
11/09/2014 2:07:47 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: nascarnation
No candidate will meet the universal demands of FR purity. (Reagan certainly wouldn’t have)
That same stupid and fallacious excuse is trotted out every election cycle to make excuses for sub-par candidates.
32 posted on
11/09/2014 2:08:56 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson