The article makes an allegation with very little proof, and there is very little proof of the threat being offered here. Lets say their was solid proof the alleged threat existed. The article gets publish, the “public” becomes “aware” of the “threat”. The public then and decides to use “politics” and “political pressure” - what would that look like? Political pressure to do what? What kind of solutions would an “aware” public offer to counter this alleged threat?
LOL, You need to come up with something real if you want to be convincing that this isn’t real and that the public shouldn’t know about it if it is.