To: ansel12
DHS needs to blab this kind of thing to prove to us they are relevant. In my opinion that is why it’s being released publically. If it was really a serious threat we wouldn’t hear about it - like we don’t hear about thwarted terrorist attacks. Why let the enemy know you know if the threat is real? That’s stupid.
36 posted on
11/06/2014 1:45:23 PM PST by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
To: dynoman
"DHS needs to blab this kind of thing to prove to us they are relevant. In my opinion that is why its being released publically. If it was really a serious threat we wouldnt hear about it - like we dont hear about thwarted terrorist attacks. Why let the enemy know you know if the threat is real? Thats stupid."
Obscurity is not the best security measure for industrial and infrastructure controls.
39 posted on
11/06/2014 1:50:04 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: dynoman
I doubt that the Russians haven’t been keeping up with it since 2011, and especially with the latest widespread news and discussion of it and the use of it against NATO and Europe, only months ago.
I want the public to be aware of such threats except when there is a reason for secrecy, I don’t see any reason related to this story today to hide it from us.
41 posted on
11/06/2014 1:57:48 PM PST by
ansel12
(The churlish behavior of Obama over the next two years is going to be spellbinding.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson