[alloysteel]

The persons who raise the most stridency about the “right to choose” also fail to define what is meant by “choose”.

Choose not to engage in sexual relations at all?

Choose voluntary sterilization?

Choose to use some form of preventing pregnancy?

Choose to terminate a pregnancy because it is “inconvenient”?

Choose to put the child out for adoption?

Choose to cause an early death of this child, because of grievous inadequacies or chronic deficiencies?

Lots of “choices”. All choices have consequences, and one of the most glaring is the some 56 MILLION children who were not born over the past 40 hears. Not only that number, but the next generation that would have been produced by that 56 million gone missing as well, sort of compound interest.

Tactically, perhaps that was a mistake, but there are no do-overs.

[Ezekiel]

They want a right to choose to be above the law of God. Of course a right like that can never exist, simply because the natural order can't contradict itself. Otherwise it would be chaos, not order.

For those in rebellion to the Creator, however, chaos is a-okay as long as they are in control (heh) of it. Talk about an endless loop of illogical mumbo-jumbo and confusion.

Hollyweird gains its wealth and power from the craft of illusion and deception, so it's no wonder its high priests and priestesses have been given over to delusion. They feast on lies so they won't get fat, I suppose.