Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fruser1
I presume yall are using the same machines we have here in Florida, at least in the Northern counties. They are about the same as the old paper ballot dropped in a box . They are far superior to the touch screen machines which are so open to fraud that the actual vote is irrelevant. The ones we use take a paper ballot which is retained and is good for a recount. This voting is, of course, open to all the traditional fraud practices such as aliens voting and dead folks and people voting multiply or stealing absentee votes, but this sort of fraud requires a lot of manpower and attention to each polling station and can be minimized in Republican leaning areas.

The touch screen machines retain no record outside of the digital output which is downloaded by a single company and is manipulable in a central location. George Soros apparently has an interest in the single company which "counts" the votes so the touch screen vote count is what he says it is. There is no recount actually possible. The machines are wiped clean when downloaded and the initial programming can be set to register Democrat when the voter inputs Republican. A proficient or properly instructed programmer can program them to show to the voter that his vote has been properly registered while actually registering a different choice. The multiple instances so far of the screen reading "Democrat" when Republican is voted indicates lack of attention to detail on the part of the programmer. Most such fraud will not give itself away on the screen.

I learned recently on FR that most of the touch screen machines have been retired as overage. I only hope that the ones still in use are all or mostly in hopelessly socialist states like Massachusetts or California where all possible efforts will be made to manipulate the vote count anyway.

15 posted on 11/04/2014 9:03:41 AM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus

See my reply-post #8 above. If they actually published all electronic votes, you could verify it was done correctly.

Still doesn’t deal w/individual voter fraud probs you describe though.


21 posted on 11/04/2014 9:09:14 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson