Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: struggle

> The skeletons, mostly of people who died in their 40s, dated from between AD 200 and AD 400...

IOW, no. And 25 wasn’t the expected life span for that era.


4 posted on 11/02/2014 7:49:33 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

they didn’t have a high refined-sugar diet and processed food diet we live off today.


5 posted on 11/02/2014 7:53:35 PM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Life expectancy was lower, because there was a high rate of mortality for children. The bulk of them died before 5 years old.

However, if you managed to reach the age of 5, than the odds of you living about as long as we do today was surprisingly good.


6 posted on 11/02/2014 7:54:45 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

>>IOW, no. And 25 wasn’t the expected life span for that era.

http://books.google.com/books?id=vh3pmAodawEC&pg=PA144#v=onepage&q&f=false

Yes, it was.


7 posted on 11/02/2014 7:56:43 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson