Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fightin Whitey
What you just. don't. get. Is that it is not the man I admire, but the attempt (and if they do not give up, the) accomplishment so many others are working on. You would condemn their efforts regardless of their nature while you condemn Branson, and in doing so wish failure and death on others.

Considering that none is without sin, should I revile all, even the most noble efforts of humankind?

Do you refuse to dress warmly because much of the information on hypothermia came from experiments carried out on camp inmates?

Do you refuse medical care because the doctor has been divorced?

At what level of sinfulness would you approve of what level of actions for the benefit of humankind?

Would you tell the fire department they can't put out your house because you heard they were at a bachelor party at a titty bar?

Whitey, how you live is up to you, but it is the accomplishment in this instance I laud, not the personal habits of the person running the show.

30 posted on 11/03/2014 12:49:11 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

Whoa, whoa, whoa.

You should read the posts, my friend. And I do, or have, considered you a friend in the area and one whom I looked up to.

I did NOT wish failure on Branson. Quite the contrary. I chimed in rather loosely about the great man not being quite so great in my view.

You’ve thrown some garbage at me now that is neither accurate nor warranted. I don’t understand why. My posts to you have been mild and, in the latter couple posts, as honest and thoughtful as I could be. I wouldn’t have given you the time if I hadn’t always thought highly of you.

If you are willing to accept without reserve the art, literature, science or social achievments of morally indifferent or morally reprehensible men (or monsters) through history, that is your choice. It’s a choice I disagree with, but that certainly doesn’t make me want to condemn you, as you have harshly condemned me.

Do you want me to ask you whether you feel NOTHING about, say, the Dachau or the Tuskogee experiments, other than the utility of the science produced? I wouldn’t stoop to such an insult.

I said nothing about suppressing science or public service or private heroism because of divorce or titty bars. I said nothing about suppressing anything because some level of SIN, which I have no expertise except that I commit plenty of it.

I expressed a personal opinion about the personal life of a man I find disagreeable. For whatever reason this has caused you to accuse me of willing people to die.

That is either a grave misperception on your part or the kind of smear I wouldn’t stand for in person.


31 posted on 11/03/2014 1:46:44 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson