There are four hospitals set up to deal with a disease like Ebola and they do very well. They’ve got the proper environment, equipment, specialists, and training. They’ve never had a worker get sick. They’ve saved 100% of their patients.
WHY aren’t all Ebola-confirmed cases sent to these places?! WHY are they even allowing the locals to deal with it? Dallas was a freaking disaster. They lost the patient and infected two staff members. Duncan may have died already, but the nurses never would been exposed had they just sent him to the hospitals that are ready to deal with it.
I am so naive and stupid. I honestly believed that they’d learned their lesson after Dallas and that they’d finally take this seriously.
Not naive and stupid, the best precursor of future behavior is past behavior...
The federal government is so PC, bloated and leviathan like, it's difficult to get it pointed in the right direction...
There are many examples of the government response to disasters getting it wrong at first or slow to act...
Once whatever issue starts to effect them politically, (votes) hell or high water won't stop them from moving in the right direction...whatever the cost...
If Ebola gets out of control no matter who is in control of our federal government they will pay at the polls...
Dems know this and already are up against the wall politically because of Obama...
Look at what Christie and Coumuo are doing in the NJ/NY...
They actually did something (21 day quarantine) without the blown kiss from Obama...