Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

I was reading that two advantages of the Shermans were numbers and speed. In a tank battle, the advantage goes to the tank that’s already there, hiding or sitting behind cover, and waiting for the other guy to come into range.


22 posted on 10/23/2014 8:55:15 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

“read that two advantages of the Shermans were numbers and speed. In a tank battle, the advantage goes to the tank that’s already there, hiding or sitting behind cover, and waiting for the other guy to come into range.”

But that is precisely why the Sherman numbers and speed mattered very much. The Nazis could sit and wait forever in the defense. The Allies had to move to their position and attack them. Speed and numbers were crucial.
Had we made the mistake of aping the German concepts, we would have probably had a very bad time of it.

The German giant tanks were simply not reliable. And their size and complexity made them hard to crank out in huge numbers. A smaller number of less reliable ponderous monsters would have been the ruin of our fast moving war.
Can anyone imagine Patton’s sweeps happening in Tigers?

But anyway, they all fall to a P-47. ANd that was what Germans fears more than anything. The Jabo.

And politics aside, the best tank of the war is probably the T-34. Fast, reliable, simple to produce and use, with slope armor, and a very good gun.


39 posted on 10/23/2014 9:26:27 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson