[Morgana]

You guys are totally missing the point of comment #1. Never mind the “woman’s” rights or the “baby’s rights okay? What about the man’s rights? Well the man has the right NOT to impregnate the woman in the first place!! How revolutionary is that? It works like this, the man keeps his pants zipped up for starts. He does not “hop in the sack” with the woman. My goodness IT’S JUST THAT EASY! The woman does not get pregnant and she never has an abortion.

Wow I’m a genius. No one ever thought of this before me.

[cripplecreek]

She’s not the only responsible party.

[sagar]

“Well the man has the right NOT to impregnate the woman in the first place!! “

You can’t battle feminism with your own version of male hate. Men do not not have the right to impregnate. Married men have duty to impregnate their women, the definition of being fruitful and multiply.

[CatherineofAragon]

"You guys are totally missing the point of comment #1. Never mind the “woman’s” rights or the “baby’s rights okay? What about the man’s rights? Well the man has the right NOT to impregnate the woman in the first place!! How revolutionary is that? It works like this, the man keeps his pants zipped up for starts. He does not “hop in the sack” with the woman. My goodness IT’S JUST THAT EASY! The woman does not get pregnant and she never has an abortion."

What, are these women all being raped?

If not, being impregnated requires the willful acts of two people.