People who think less regulation is better than more are purporting to tell people what they should be doing with their smartphones.
If Lawrence wants to take nude selfies, why does anybody care about whether that is right or wrong as a conservative? Shouldn’t conservatives share Lawrence’s sense of outrage, given she followed the rules as she understood them - delete them and you’re good.
The original poster was asking “Why?” As in - why take the photos?
As a conservative, our position should be it doesn’t matter WHAT she did with her phone. Somebody stole her stuff and she feels personally violated.
But right on cue, the holier than thou crowd forgot that any sin will keep you from Heaven, and decided to question someone else’s morality as if somehow they had no hand in personally crucifying Christ themselves.
If someone wants to take nude selfies, that’s on them, and frankly between them and their God. However, regardless of what was taken, there isn’t a single conservative that can’t empathize with the sense of personal violation one has when ANYTHING is stolen from them.
We could win both houses back in super majorities by simply pointing out that the party that used to rail against government insinuating itself into every aspect of their lives has become the party that has elevated the artform.
People want to be left alone - quiet enjoyment. You can’t even own a bakery anymore without being threatened by militant homosexuals.
It appears that telling other people what they ought to be doing is a truly bipartisan pursuit.
Your rambling response did not address the two main questions I posed to you.
It’s too hard for me to discern what your point of view is. So I yield back to you.