Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MortMan
But there was no “sex” in the act of stealing the photos at all.

Honestly, I cannot decide if it should be treated as a sex crime.

If it was child pornography, with no actual sex, most would agree it was a sex crime.

If someone else took the photos without her knowledge, like a hidden dressing room camera, some would consider it a "sex" crime.

Most would agree, if the photos were not about forbidden nudes, they would not have been taken and sold to the tabloids.

43 posted on 10/07/2014 8:41:11 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

You bring up a good point that I had not accounted for. If the photos were taken without her permission, then the original photography may be considered sex related, to the same extent that peeping-tom offenses are.

But if the pics were consensual, the fact that an adult woman’s nude photos were stolen is about theft, not sex.


56 posted on 10/07/2014 8:59:27 AM PDT by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson